--- description: Reviews zu GitHub Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche GitHub mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: GitHub | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Source Code Control Systeme](/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) > [GitHub](/software/397820/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github Seite: 1 / 248\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) > GitHub ist eine Projektmanagement- und Code-Sharing-Plattform, mit der Nutzer ihre Codes mit anderen teilen und mithilfe kollektiver Intelligenz erstellen/vervielfältigen können. Die Software lässt sich für verschiedene Arten von Codezuweisungen verwenden, einschließlich persönlicher, Open-Source- und Geschäftscodes. Erhältlich für den On-Premise- und cloudbasierten Einsatz. Nutzer können alle Versionen ihres Codes speichern und beispielsweise über Einladungen oder Erwähnungen mit anderen Nutzern kollaborieren. Entwickler können Communitys beitreten, in denen Open-Source-Projekte verfolgt werden. Fertige Codes lassen sich für Experimente, Hinweise und andere Projekte nutzen. Alle Beiträge in Open-Source-Projekten werden in Entwicklerprofilen aufgezeichnet. Unternehmen jeder Größe nutzen GitHub als integriertes Tool für die Codeentwicklung. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 6179 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 6179 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Microsoft - **Region**: Redmond, USA - **Gegründet**: 1975 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 4,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Brasilien, Bulgarien, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Estland, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Indonesien, Irak, Island, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kroatien, Lettland und 27 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Agile Methodiken - Anfragenmanagement - Anwendungssicherheit - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Authentifizierung - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Code-Bearbeitung - Code-Entwicklung - Codeprüfung - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Daten-Import / -Export - Debuggen - Etikettierung - Feedback-Management ## Integrationen (15 insgesamt) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) - [Continuous-Integration-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4694/continuous-integration/software) - [Online Projektmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/436/web-based/software) - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) - [SAST-Tools (Static Application Security Testing)](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4429/sast/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/410128/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15388 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1221 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/205546/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2231 reviews) 5. [Odoo](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/77019/odoo-pos) — 4.2/5 (1308 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6. April 2026* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Nachteile**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- ### "The industry gold standard for version control and CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *23. April 2026* | Sportartikel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The developer experience remains the highest level of quality. GitHub Actions provides an easy way to implement CI/CD. The pull request interface offers the most effective solution for conducting code reviews in the industry. My daily work output has increased because the system now integrates with almost all my essential tools which include Slack and Jira and IDEs and Copilot. > > **Nachteile**: The notification system can become overwhelming on large projects if not carefully configured. The Project Management boards (GitHub Projects) provide excellent user experience but still require additional development to reach the same level of functionality found in dedicated tools like Jira, which handle complex agile workflows. > > I have used GitHub for my personal projects and my professional work for multiple years. The platform provides a full development ecosystem which goes beyond its basic function as a Git hosting service. The platform's main strengths come from its community features and its dependable performance. The application functions as my most reliable tool which I can use without any concerns. ----- ### "best code management before microsoft acquisition" — 4.0/5 > **Terry** | *16. Mai 2025* | Metallabbau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: best place for code management across different coders, the ability to control access and track issues is perfect for agile projects > > **Nachteile**: ever since the acquisition from microsoft, github becomes a tool to advertise microsoft products. I have to use microsoft authenticator to log in with stupid 2 factor authentication requirement. ----- ### "A must-have tool for everyday development" — 5.0/5 > **Daniel** | *19. Mai 2026* | Essen & Trinken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I really enjoy GitHub's clean and intuitive interface, which makes navigation straightforward even for complex projects. The collaborative environment is one of its strongest points — working with my team of four developers feels natural and well-supported. Pull Requests are a feature I use constantly; they make code review organized and transparent, which is essential when coordinating changes across the team. I also love being able to store and deploy my web applications directly from GitHub to other platforms, which streamlines my entire development workflow. > > **Nachteile**: Merge conflicts can be frustrating. When I'm working simultaneously with a teammate and they push changes, it sometimes overwrites or breaks parts of my project due to conflicting edits. For developers who are still learning version control, this can be especially confusing and time-consuming to resolve. Better real-time conflict warnings or prevention tools would be a great improvement. > > I have been using GitHub for three years, starting back in university and continuing into my professional career as a systems engineer. I use it both individually and as part of a small team to build and manage web applications. Despite the occasional merge conflict headache, GitHub remains my go-to platform for version control, collaboration, and deployment. It has genuinely become an indispensable part of my daily workflow. ----- ### "Github over 2 years" — 5.0/5 > **Rakhi** | *23. April 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Its strong version control, because it makes it easy to track changes, identify who made them, and restore earlier versions when needed. I also liked the pull request workflow, since it makes code reviews more organized and helps improve code quality before anything is merged. Another major advantage is how easy it is to collaborate with a team through branches, comments, and shared repositories without disrupting the main codebase. Finally, GitHub’s integrations and automation features are very useful because they support testing, deployment, and overall project management in one place. > > **Nachteile**: managing permissions and repository settings can become confusing, especially in larger teams where access levels, branch protections, and admin controls are spread across different places. Another pain point is that pull requests can get hard to review when they are large or when there are too many comments, making it easy to miss important feedback or lose track of what still needs to be addressed. > > It provides a reliable and well-structured environment for managing code, collaborating with teams, and tracking development work. The platform is especially strong for version control, pull requests, and maintaining visibility into changes across a project. At the same time, some parts of the interface, such as permissions and complex pull request discussions, can feel harder to manage as projects grow. Overall, it has been a valuable tool for keeping development organized and improving team collaboration. ----- Seite: 1 / 248\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten