ALM/Quality Center

4,4
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

4,4
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

Alle Bewertungen zu ALM/Quality Center Filter anwenden

Filtern nach:
Sortieren nach:
4 von 23 Bewertungen

Nutzerbewertungen zu ALM/Quality Center durchsuchen

4 von 23 Bewertungen

Alle Bewertungen zu ALM/Quality Center Filter anwenden

Filtern nach:
4 von 23 Bewertungen
Sortieren nach:
Judith
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
2
Funktionalität
3
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
3

3
Bewertet am 29.6.2022

ALM doesn't have the bang for the buck.

Vorteile

This software is great for tracking requirements and tests. It also tracks issues found, and when they are corrected. However, the reporting is clunky and not easy to work with.

Nachteile

Higher level review to give management insite into the project.

Verifizierter Rezensent Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
2
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
3

4
Bewertet am 25.6.2021

A Quality tool that lost its edge for Agile Development

Overall good, for non-agile products especially. It is a quality product that doesn't run into problems or issues - very enterprise-grade.

Vorteile

The way that the functionality is organized (requirements - plans - test - runs - reports) makes a lot of sense. The traceability across the phases of the release works really well.

Nachteile

It is just difficult to transpose the way this tool is organized to Agile sprints and releases. It requires substantial effort to make it work in an Agile environment.

Antwort von OpenText

Thanks for giving our product a very positive rating and pointing out it's enterprise-grade and has more robust functionality. You mentioned you need Agile functionality - you have the choice to use Micro Focus ALM Octane (see: https://www.microfocus.com/products/alm-octane/overview), or ALM/Quality Center with Jira integration (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kleONygrbc&list=PLlUdEXI83_XpO-noDZHe0NtfaQ3lu_OG5&index=3). ALM Octane has not only full-fledged Agile and DevOps functionalities, but also test and quality management capabilities like ALM/Quality Center.

Beantwortet am 2.8.2021
Naveen
Naveen Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 9.5.2021

Better Application Lifecycle Management tool in the market

Vorteile

It is a fairly easy to use application management tool available in the market which has features to track the status of a defect.

Nachteile

It would be better if we have an ability to create diagrams especially when we are dealing with complex defect created by Tester.

Antwort von OpenText

Thanks for giving ALM/Quality Center a very positive rating and pointing out it is easy to use. Regarding your comment on the ability to create diagrams, we are not sure what you are referring to. Could you share more details and which version you are using? You may check the online help: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/alm to see whether the latest version supports the feature you need, and if applicable submit an enhancement idea at https://community.microfocus.com/adtd/sws-qc/i/alm_qc_idea_exchange.

Ying Lei
Product Marketing Manager, Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center

Beantwortet am 25.5.2021
Ricky
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 15.7.2021

Good software for test management

Overall good experience with project life cycle and defect Management.

Vorteile

Easy to use and very organized portal for defect and quality management for a project. Variety of Reporting options available.

Nachteile

Overall good software but looks bit heavy while loading and UI could be more user friendly and faster would have more helpful.

Antwort von OpenText

Thanks for giving ALM/Quality Center a high rating. Regarding the UI, we now have some new types of clients more friendly and lightweight. ALM Client Launcher (see: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/alm-client-launcher) is a Windows-based client that can completely replace the traditional ALM client and is much easier to maintain. The Web Runner (see: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/alm/en/15.5-15.5.1/online_help/Content/Web_Runner/main_menu.htm) is a pure web-based UI that you can use regardless of the browser and OS you use (Windows, MacOS and Linux all work). We're continuing adding more capabilities to the Web Runner, please stay tuned.

Beantwortet am 2.8.2021
4 von 4 Bewertungen

Ähnliche Kategorien