
Ansys Fluent
Alle Bewertungen zu Ansys Fluent Filter anwenden
Nutzerbewertungen zu Ansys Fluent durchsuchen
Alle Bewertungen zu Ansys Fluent Filter anwenden
- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Always prefer STAR-CCM+ over Ansys Fluent
(Ran out of space from above question, so continuing here)
which should not be the case, as it is 2022 and opening a website for reading instructions should be the most easily available thing.
6) If there is only one or two persons who answer the questions on probably a 1000 + strong or more community on the forum, you definitely need more people who could man the ansys forum. Most of the time, the answers are actually more questions, which rather point on to 1 or 2 simple things or, a new question alltogether, making the whole process of going to the forum, quite useless.
And if by any chance, the question is tricky enough, they direct to open the ticket, which takes another god knows how many days, with response that "I will get back to you soon" and this soon comes withint 1 month or so, not with answers , but with more questions.
7) Also had the privilage to get a 850£ subscription to the training page, which was such a bad design. (Why don't you hire a better UI designer?), and finding data on the same was very challenging. One also needs to write email to that lady quite often, to ask for stuff, and this should not be the case. After all , for what exactly did I pay 850£ for?
The training portal, is also suppose to be self-explainatory with the new versions of pdf, however, it sometimes seems, the pdfs were never updated, and I wished again for Star-CCM+.
8) So if I have to write script, scheme is the last language I would do it with because it is not 1960.
Vorteile
used v19R2, did the basic CFD, however, meshing on a simple geometry such as rounded pipe, seemed like a hassle. So you tell me if there is even worth going forward.
Nachteile
Where do I start.
1) The customer support, is now directed to the ansys forum, which I am sure, some indians are doing a good job on it, however, its a very badly maintained source. The previous version of going to portal and looking for a pdf (assuming due to some blessing, it is available), was a better approach.
If you cannot open a file, becuase someone is trying to send a snapshot, then please find it in your heart to buy a better anti-virus software. I am sure such a big company such as ansys can open an attachment, if it cant get everyone through the ticketing system, which by the way, is also not very useful, or so late, that the user, ends interest, or endures to find a new method, which does not require the crappy customer support of Fluent.
I am guessing that is a win win for Ansys fluent anyways.
3) The ticketing system, never was useful, as I said, needed to couple fluent with python, for v19R2, and appraently, that feature is not made yet. These are the times I wished, my supervisors had agreed on Star-CCM+, instead of fluent.
4) If something has been discontinued, or will be discontinued, take it out from the list of radio buttons or drop down menus. It is simple software engineering basic.
5) Also, again, I wished, the customer portal, were open to more appropriate documentation when required. Putting up everything online in form of instructions manual was a bad decision. Also, i am pretty sure, you had not notice, that the website, opens slowly,

- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Specialized and practical simulation tool for CFD related problems
Vorteile
Highly specialized algorithms for diverse geometry and calculation strategies, allowing multi-physics problems could be solved easily without over consuming your hardware resources. Helping us to save an enormous amount of time and effort in understanding and predicting complex phenomena, Ansys seems like a must-have for engineers of our era.
Nachteile
Being a part of the Ansys ecosystem, unlike simple academic softwares, you should at least be familiar with the system in order to fully operate their functions. But for an engineer / numerical simulation professional this should be done in no time.
- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
My Love-Hate Relationship with Ansys Fluent
Overall, Ansys Fluent is an incredibly useful tool for simulation, but it comes with a steep learning curve. If you're willing to put in the time and effort to learn it, the results are well worth it.
Vorteile
As someone who used Ansys Fluent during my PhD studies for air quality, I found it to be a powerful but complicated simulation software. One of the best things about Fluent is that it allows you to create your 3D geometry using other software and save it in a format that Fluent can read, saving you the trouble of learning how to model in different software. The results provided by Fluent are excellent and provide a wealth of data for analysis, including animations and various plots.
Nachteile
While it has a user-friendly interface, it takes a lot of time to learn and is not very intuitive. I highly recommend trying some tutorials before diving in. Also, running complex simulations with a mesh of millions of elements requires a powerful cluster and can take a long time. The results are great, however, it's not always easy to get there. Errors often appear during the learning process, but the software has a strong community of users, open forums, and assistance to rely on.
- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Fluent solutions by "Fluent" for heat transfer problems
The interface is smooth and is kept up to date to the modern industrial problems, but some times the frequent updates of software keeps the simulations run in the earlier versions unviable.
Vorteile
Working in heat transfer domain, the software offers plethora of options for different types of thermal management techniques. The interactive user interface allows user to navigate through the options at ease and tutorial support offered gives additional boost to new entrants in the software
Nachteile
Some times the intrinsic details that needs to be tweaked based on experimental conditions remain stubborn and unrealistic causing the software to deviate from the outputs intended from a set of conditions

- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Robust CFD Solver
I used Fluent in the automotive and aviation industries. I have more than 7 years for the application that I have used Fluent.
Vorteile
Fluent has numerous options to solve various types of flow. It produces fast and accurate results. According to comparison with experimental results, CFD results satisfy the researcher most of the time.
Nachteile
The software does not allow the user to modify the source code. It has some features to modify some interface but is not desirable for every researcher.
- Branche: Forschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Ralfs review
i am solving transient room airflow and multiregion problems (solid/fluid combinations)
Vorteile
The ability to use it in batch mode and the possibility to implement udf
Nachteile
that you stoppt Gambit (it is much faster and often creates better grids)
the graphical support under linux
it is not possible to export the cases in older versions