
cPanel & WHM
Alle Bewertungen zu cPanel & WHM Filter anwenden
Nutzerbewertungen zu cPanel & WHM durchsuchen
Alle Bewertungen zu cPanel & WHM Filter anwenden

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Easy Interface Yet Expsneive.
Vorteile
WHM/cPanel is everything you need to manage your server. Managing server becomes super easy with WHM. It's fast, responsive, easy to use and secure. WHM is packed with tons of features which are required to manage a server. I've been using WHM since 7 or more years and I'm fully satisfied.
Nachteile
Only thing I don't like about WHM/cPanel is it's price. It's way expensive these days.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Easy Self-Serve Site Management
I like cPanel. It's familiarity and ease of use means that nearly every web host I use is a matter of choosing based on service and pricing rather than ease-of-use.
Vorteile
With a few odd exceptions, most things are relatively easy to find within cPanel. Because cPanel is so prevalent in web hosting, learning how to use it once means you can re-use the same skills and knowledge even when moving to many other hosts. Most functionality is straightforward enough that someone with minimal knowledge can find their wat around and make changes if needed.
Nachteile
Some web hosts still use outdated versions of cPanel which are harder to navigate and use. It would be nice if cPanel somehow operated like cloud software where all hosts are automatically using the most up-to-date version. Not sure if that's technically feasible. From the handful of web hosts I've used, I've noticed that often there is functionality in cPanel that is duplicated outside in the web hosts own interface, and as a result changes made to some aspects of a hosting service done within cPanel don't actually do anything. This is frustrating and usually results in a call to my hosts tech support unless the solution is obvious. I wish that those duplicated functions in cPanel would just redirect me to the right place. Some of the language in the platform can be ambiguious, although that said, I'm not a professional dev - just a hobbyist so perhaps with more background knowledge that wouldn't be an issue.

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
WHM cPanel is the best web hosting management system
WHM cPanel is very secure, robust, and easy to use.
Vorteile
WHM cPanel has the most advanced features among all the webserver management system. The user interface is easy to use and requires no programming skills to manage the WHM system. With WHM cPanel I can easily set up domains, install websites, create backups, and migrate websites across the servers on a fly.
Nachteile
WHM cPanel is a powerful web hosting management system. But it is quite resourceful, if there had been light version of cPanel, it would been even more better.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
PleskWarum cPanel & WHM gewählt wurde
WHM cPanel provided a complete set of features and easy to use interface.Gründe für den Wechsel zu cPanel & WHM
WHM cPanel is easy to use and has a great support team than its other alternatives like Direct Admin, Hepsia Panel, Virtualmin, Ajenti, and Plesk.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Most popular Hosting mananagement solution
Automation and peace of mind with WHM is the best feature to invest in it.
Vorteile
WHM provides automation and convenience in managing Web Hosting business. Services management and automatic services restart is a great feature to get going your server anytime without interruption.
Nachteile
Only two licensing models are available for VPS and Dedicated servers. For small hosting or for developers there is no option for limited domains.

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
- Monatlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Easy and simple but a bit slow
CPanel has always been one of my favourite control panels due to its simplicity: once you know where to find all the options and things you commonly used you go faster to that page. However, if you don't have money to afford CPanel (it's a bit expensive), you should look for other cheaper alternatives
Vorteile
It has a simple and modern UI that displays all the major categories and features in the home page.
It has a very good file manager with all the details you need for an hosting
It manages very well domains
Nachteile
UI could be tweaked more
Speed: since it's not built as a "Single Page Application" (SPA) it is a bit slow when switching pages and submitting forms
There isn't an easy way to deeply customize it: if you edit the source code then updating to newer versions is difficult...
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Makes web hosting management a breeze
I have set up WHM on several production servers, for various clients, some of whom had very little Linux experience, yet have still be able to use the software with very little support from myself. WHM does a great job of keeping itself up to date, and I have come to trust it and recommend it to my clients.
Vorteile
WHM removes many of the obstacles of running a hosting service, by providing all the functionality you need, without the requirement of understanding all the underlying technology. Users are able to concentrate on their business, rather than learning and maintaining all the processes behind the scenes.
Nachteile
There is a recurring monthly (or annual) fee, rather than a one-off payment. However in my experience this software has paid for itself many times over. Due to the nature of managing a complex system, sometimes problems do arise, however there is a wealth of information available on the web, and the support I have received has been very effective.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Good product - Easy to Manage.
Vorteile
Web server configuration easy to mange and security tools also good .
Nachteile
Easily we can change php versions. Its easy to manage web frameworks.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Cpanel is easy
I would have to say the overall experience with Cpanel is positive. I still use it today. The file explorer is really nice too.
Vorteile
When I purchased hosting from Godaddy, it came with Cpanel. It is really easy to use and well supported. I never really needed assistance on learning how to use it. A straightforward user interface makes it seem similar to the way you use your desktop. A big plus is that it's stable. You can change php versions, and install software, etc...
Nachteile
Well, I suppose one con is that if you want to setup a cron job, you will need to know how to use the command line in unix/linux. This may be tough.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
cPanel it a little bit meh..
I love their functionalities, design and API, but i hate the pricing.
Vorteile
It have a lot of great features and a great design, a solution for almost every hosting provider.
Nachteile
A big "-" would be the pricing, cPanel is increasing their prices every year and a lot of hosting providers started to move out.

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Mehr Details anzeigen
Easy deploy your software
Vorteile
It has a great UI which makes server management easy and efficient.
Nachteile
Navigation on the file explorer could be improvised.