SpiraTeam

4,2
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

4,2
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Zum Anbieter

Alle Bewertungen zu SpiraTeam Filter anwenden

Filtern nach:
Sortieren nach:
6 von 98 Bewertungen

Nutzerbewertungen zu SpiraTeam durchsuchen

6 von 98 Bewertungen
Sortieren nach:
Daniel
Daniel
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
2
Funktionalität
3
Bedienkomfort
2
Kundenbetreuung
4

3
Bewertet am 21.11.2016

A complete vision of the projects

I was used SpiraTeam in some projects. Our work with the application was right, but our experience with it, is like a fixed application with a strongest modulation of the project process. The UI, is not very friendly with a complex form to work on it.
Is true, that you can add any document, requirement, task or other in each moment, but you cannot change the flow of the project. In action it is maddening because you has not clarity of the steps to do with the different parts of the project.
But, if you have a big project with many people that need to interact (for example, you need to follow the status of the tasks and the test cases by developer) it is your project application.

Vorteile

The application can modify to adapt the workflow to your needs (based on a complex workflow). The document management is very good. You can change a part of UI (colors, logos, etc.). You can do a personal dashboard with your heat points. This could help you to focus your most important points.

Nachteile

In my personal opinion, the application needs a guidance or a screen that can show the flow process to make more easy the entry of the project elements.

Antwort von Inflectra

Thanks for the feedback. We are adding a new user onboarding wizard into SpiraTeam to guide a new user through the project management process that is enabled in SpiraTeam.

We're not sure which version Daniel used, but v5.0 has a completely overhauled user interface which our users are loving.

Beantwortet am 21.11.2016
Juan
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
3

5
Bewertet am 1.8.2019

Capitec Bank Feedback

Most excellent, brings our Business and testing together in understanding the req.

Vorteile

The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product.

Very powerful tool if used as designed.

Nachteile

Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

TestRail

Gründe für den Wechsel zu SpiraTeam

Brings all the elements of Testing together. One time shoe shine.
Erin
Erin Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 23.12.2015

Great Tool For The Entire Project Life Cycle

We have been using SpiraTeam within our organization for quite a few years. SpiraTeam is very easy to use, and is a great way to help track, maintain and troubleshoot an entire project, from the planning stages, to implementation, to enhancement requests and software bug and defect resolution. I would recommend SpiraTeam to any organization looking for a straightforward, easy to use tool.

Vorteile

Pros:

Easy to use
Versatile
Tracks multiple project points

Nachteile

Cons:

Cannot easily move artifacts from one project to another.

Jim
Jim Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 30.1.2015

Best Value Alternative to the Big Bloated Beasts

This is a great suite for managing the application development life cycle. Very competitive in features and functions. This suite is just as good, if not better than IBM's or HP's suites. I've now worked with all three and can easily recommend this for all but the most complex and complicated organizations. I'm using the SaaS version and it works great. Gartner positions this in the niche-players section of its magic quadrant when it should be in the Leaders section, far above and to the right of the others!

Vorteile

Functionality
Reasonable Documentation
Customer Service
Pricing

Nachteile

None discovered yet

Martin
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 23.2.2021

Facilitates the daily work

SpiraTeam is used to manage the test cases of five different development languages and more than fifteen different base products. The overview of all products is elementary and is very well solved in SpiraTeam.
The selection of connectable test software is very good.

Vorteile

SpiraTeam is clear and intuitive to use.
The cockpits are a good starting point for daily work.

Nachteile

The structure of the requirements is not transferred from DevOps and after grouping the original types are lost.

Antwort von Inflectra

We are looking to add a way to keep the requirement types from ADO once the requirements are nested and grouped in the SpiraTeam hierarchy.

Beantwortet am 26.2.2021
Peter
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
  • Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 27.10.2017

My contacts with Inflectra can only be reviewed at 5-star at the moment

A very good tool for my QA skill set

Vorteile

Integration of all tools, open interfaces, online access from anywhere => to showcase example business cases to my customers, ease of use,

Nachteile

It would be good to have the possibility to create own reports, that can be used as official QA-Reports... every customer has his own QA-Reporting requirements
(...but maybe I haven't found it yet...)

6 von 6 Bewertungen

Ähnliche Kategorien