Über SpiraTeam

SpiraTeam ist eine Projektmanagementlösung, die Kollaborations- und Qualitätssicherungswerkzeuge für Unternehmen aller Größen und Branchen bietet. Die Lösung kann entweder in der Cloud oder vor Ort bereitgestellt werden und ist mit den meisten Webbrowsern kompatibel. SpiraTeam eignet sich für IT-Fachleute und Projektmanagende, die Projekte analysieren und durchführen möchten.

SpiraTeam bietet wichtige Funktionen wie Aufgabenmanagement, Ressourcenmanagement, Portfoliomanagement, Dateifreigabe und Problemmanagement. Die Lösung ermöglicht es Projektmanagenden, Teammitglieder zu planen, Ressourcen für bestimmte Aufgaben zuzuweisen und den Projektstatus in Echtzeit zu überprüfen. Teammitglieder können den Fortschritt jedes Projekts anhand der aktuellen und verbleibenden Aufgaben aktualisieren. Jedes Projekt verfügt über ein Dashboard, das alle Informationen zu seinem Status zusammenfasst.

Zur Lösung gehört ein kostenloser Produktsupport für ein Jahr per Telefon oder Helpdesk inklusive Zugang zu einer Online-Wissensdatenbank. Für Neukunden steht eine kostenlose Testversion zur Verfügung. Die Preise richten sich nach Nutzer und Monat.

SpiraTeam Software - 1
SpiraTeam Software - 2
SpiraTeam Software - 3
SpiraTeam Software - 4
SpiraTeam Software - 5
SpiraTeam Software - 6
SpiraTeam Video
SpiraTeam Software - 1 - Vorschau
SpiraTeam Software - 2 - Vorschau
SpiraTeam Software - 3 - Vorschau
SpiraTeam Software - 4 - Vorschau
SpiraTeam Software - 5 - Vorschau

SpiraTeam Preis

SpiraTeam bietet keine Gratisversion, aber eine kostenlose Testversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von SpiraTeam ist ab 57,33 $/Monat verfügbar.

Startpreis:
57,33 $/Monat
Kostenlose Version:
Nein
Kostenlose Testversion:
Ja

Alternativen für SpiraTeam

TestRail

4,3 (173 Bewertungen)
TestRail Test Case Management ist eine cloudbasierte Plattform, mit der Nutzer Softwaretests verwalten, verfolgen und...

Bugzilla

4,1 (138 Bewertungen)
Bugzilla ist eine Open-Source-Softwarelösung für Bug-Nachverfolgung, mit der Softwareentwickelnde Fehler und Defekte...

Jira

4,4 (15140 Bewertungen)
Jira Software ist ein Management-Tool für Geschäftsprozesse. Agile Teams nutzen es zur Planung, Nachverfolgung und zum...

Wrike

4,3 (2789 Bewertungen)
Wrike ist eine cloudbasierte Projektmanagement-Plattform für Teams ab 20 Mitarbeitenden, die sowohl für große Unternehme...

Asana

4,5 (13383 Bewertungen)
Asana ist die perfekte Plattform, um Agile-Projekte in Ihrem Unternehmen zu verwalten und umzusetzen. Asana hilft Teams...

monday.com

4,6 (5409 Bewertungen)
Die herausragende Kollaborations- und Projektmanagementplattform monday.com hilft Teams bei der gemeinsamen effizienten...

ClickUp

4,6 (4435 Bewertungen)
ClickUp ist ein cloudbasiertes Tool für Kollaboration und Projektmanagement, das sich für Unternehmen aller Größen und...

Trello

4,5 (23477 Bewertungen)
Trello ist ein Tool für die visuelle Zusammenarbeit, das zur Planung von Aufgaben und Projekten verwendet wird. Es ist...

Keto

4,0 (46 Bewertungen)
Keto ist eine cloudbasierte Lösung, mit der Unternehmen automatisierte Workflows erstellen können, um Teams, Projekte,...

Aha!

4,7 (552 Bewertungen)
Aha! ist eine cloudbasierte Projektmanagementlösung für kleine, mittlere und große Unternehmen. Die Lösung richtet sich...

Zoho Sprints

4,5 (275 Bewertungen)
Zoho Sprints ist eine cloudbasierte Produkt-Roadmap-Lösung für Unternehmen jeder Größe. Die Lösung wurde für agile...

Miro

4,7 (1626 Bewertungen)
Miro ist ein cloudbasiertes Kollaborationstool für kleine bis mittlere Unternehmen. Die Lösung verfügt über ein...

GoodDay

4,7 (148 Bewertungen)
GoodDay ist eine cloudbasierte Projektmanagementlösung, die sich an Unternehmen aller Größen in verschiedenen Branchen...

Adobe Workfront

4,4 (1491 Bewertungen)
Adobe Workfront ist eine kollaborative Arbeitsmanagementlösung, die die Herausforderungen von getrennten Teams,...

Projektron BCS

4,6 (37 Bewertungen)
Die webbasierte Projektmanagement-Software Projektron BCS unterstützt Sie während des gesamten Projektlebenszyklus: bei...

Nutzerbewertungen zu SpiraTeam durchsuchen

98 von 98 Bewertungen
Sortieren nach:
Aaron
Aaron Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Versicherung
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 16.10.2018

SpiraTeam gives visibility to the work getting done!

My company purchase this and said "here, figure out how to use this for your project". It took be a couple of hours to put all the pieces together. It is rather intuitive and user friendly. I was able to guide the team into how we intend to use the tool to develop our software product. It was easy to get the team engaged in using SpiraTeam.

Vorteile

I like that we can see the work move across the Planning (Kanban) Board so it gives great visibility to the entire team of the work that is being done. It is great for agile approach to software development. It provides great integration from Requirement to Development to Testing to Completed.

Nachteile

The toughest part of using this new tool was to determine at what level to put the requirements into the system. As we were transitioning to agile at the same time we determined to put features into the tool as requirements and write user stories for each feature. It worked well. My team experienced some clunkiness, but I believe it was the way we had the tool configured as opposed to the tool itself. We changed the permissions on a couple of roles (BA, Developer) and it worked much better. We also changed some of the default workflows to make it work better.

Donna
  • Branche: Automotive
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 23.4.2024

#1 Product for Testing, Requirements Traceability and Defect Tracking

Our team brought SpiraTeam on-prem 7 years ago from a SaaS product. We are able to save files that may contain server or employee sensitive information. Product is used globally from business users to full development teams. No complaints with the exception of offering a broader offering of reports. Fantastic customer service - the [sensitive content hidden] himself has joined discussions to ensure we are pleased with the product and is open to any recommendations.

Vorteile

It's very easy to use while also providing 100% Requirement Traceability and can easily be utilized as a product backlog. Teams benefit from being able to track issues not associated with specific tests. Artifacts can be linked to each other with one-click. Resource assignments easily displayed. Customizable drop-down fields and customizable workflows.

Nachteile

The need to have XML experience to customize the default reports. Vendor provided upload file works very well but could use some updating.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Jira

Gründe für den Wechsel zu SpiraTeam

The price of Jira was much higher, the functionality was confusing and required a much more rigid workflow.
Daniel
Daniel
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
2
Funktionalität
3
Bedienkomfort
2
Kundenbetreuung
4

3
Bewertet am 21.11.2016

A complete vision of the projects

I was used SpiraTeam in some projects. Our work with the application was right, but our experience with it, is like a fixed application with a strongest modulation of the project process. The UI, is not very friendly with a complex form to work on it.
Is true, that you can add any document, requirement, task or other in each moment, but you cannot change the flow of the project. In action it is maddening because you has not clarity of the steps to do with the different parts of the project.
But, if you have a big project with many people that need to interact (for example, you need to follow the status of the tasks and the test cases by developer) it is your project application.

Vorteile

The application can modify to adapt the workflow to your needs (based on a complex workflow). The document management is very good. You can change a part of UI (colors, logos, etc.). You can do a personal dashboard with your heat points. This could help you to focus your most important points.

Nachteile

In my personal opinion, the application needs a guidance or a screen that can show the flow process to make more easy the entry of the project elements.

Antwort von Inflectra

Thanks for the feedback. We are adding a new user onboarding wizard into SpiraTeam to guide a new user through the project management process that is enabled in SpiraTeam.

We're not sure which version Daniel used, but v5.0 has a completely overhauled user interface which our users are loving.

Beantwortet am 21.11.2016
Dusan
  • Branche: Bankwesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 21.11.2023

Spira test manager review

Great help for test management, bug management, reporting.

Vorteile

ISTQB theory is implemented in Spira. Easy to use in different categories. A lot of opportunities for project management.

Nachteile

There are no big problems but I have to mention better connection with Jira, full range of services to be implemented in both directions.

Juan
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
3

5
Bewertet am 1.8.2019

Capitec Bank Feedback

Most excellent, brings our Business and testing together in understanding the req.

Vorteile

The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product.

Very powerful tool if used as designed.

Nachteile

Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

TestRail

Gründe für den Wechsel zu SpiraTeam

Brings all the elements of Testing together. One time shoe shine.
Erin
Erin Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 23.12.2015

Great Tool For The Entire Project Life Cycle

We have been using SpiraTeam within our organization for quite a few years. SpiraTeam is very easy to use, and is a great way to help track, maintain and troubleshoot an entire project, from the planning stages, to implementation, to enhancement requests and software bug and defect resolution. I would recommend SpiraTeam to any organization looking for a straightforward, easy to use tool.

Vorteile

Pros:

Easy to use
Versatile
Tracks multiple project points

Nachteile

Cons:

Cannot easily move artifacts from one project to another.

Brian
Brian Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Papier & forstwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 28.8.2014

Great affordable Project Lifecycle Management tool!

My team and I have been using SpiraTeam for over a year now. We continue to be impressed by how customizable the product is. The ability to create custom workflows for Requirements and Incidents really allows us to make this product conform to our companies methodology. We aren't forced to follow a rigid methodology (Pure waterfall or Scrum). We can configure the application to follow our specific needs.

Vorteile

-Hosted solution, no infrastructure to worry about, Inflectra handles the backups, upgrades, servers, etc
-Customizable workflows
-Easy to learn UI
-Plug-in for integration with our Automated Testing tool
-Plug-in for Visual Studio

Nachteile

-At times it can be a little slow when loading new pages, not huge lag but enough to be annoying
-The out of the box reports aren't the best and creating custom reports is challenging

iain
iain Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 25.9.2014

I'm a big fan of the application

I'm a big fan of the application.

I manage the testing team for an IS department and was unhappy with the existing tools we had, so I evaluated a number of tools to replace what we used. The outcome put SpiraTest in the top 5.

After using the free trial for a few weeks I was sold.

Vorteile

+ Excellent price:
+ Mature tool:
+ Good integration:
+ Good support:

Nachteile

SLA support for hosting: As I work for a big company , there’s a demand for 24hour support and clear SLAs. Inflectra don’t provide that level of cover. That said, I’ve not had any problems in the 9 months I have used the tool.

Jim
Jim Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 30.1.2015

Best Value Alternative to the Big Bloated Beasts

This is a great suite for managing the application development life cycle. Very competitive in features and functions. This suite is just as good, if not better than IBM's or HP's suites. I've now worked with all three and can easily recommend this for all but the most complex and complicated organizations. I'm using the SaaS version and it works great. Gartner positions this in the niche-players section of its magic quadrant when it should be in the Leaders section, far above and to the right of the others!

Vorteile

Functionality
Reasonable Documentation
Customer Service
Pricing

Nachteile

None discovered yet

Silvin
Silvin Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Outsourcing/Offshoring
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

3
Bewertet am 2.10.2014

User Experience

The functionality are ideal to work with in a typical agile project management environment

Vorteile

Project Requirements management works okay

Nachteile

The Planning board is not efficient in terms of task management

Doug
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 5.3.2014

SpiraTeam an easy implementation and Great Customer Support

As a QA Manager I've worked with many defect tracking systems and ALM tools including TFS and HP QC\ALM. SpiraTeam is quick to implement and easy to work with. The key is mapping out your hierarchy and workflows for the project or all your projects if you're creating a template. This makes creating future projects a snap. The ease and flexibility of creating a custom Issue workflow was also key to a quick implementation. SpiraTeam has good basic functionality covering the different SDLC artifacts Issues, Requirements, Test Management, Releases, etc... There may be some features higher tiered ALM tools may have, but if they're not must haves for your team then SpiraTeam is the way to go.

I've worked with the Inflectra Support team on easy and very complex issues. They've been very responsive on their communication and followups. They're always a joy to work with.

Vorteile

Easy and Quick Implementation
Ease of use througout
Pricing
Good overall functionality across the board for all SDLC Artifacts, not just Defect Tracking
Integration to third party software
Great Customer Support
Importing of artifacts is easy

Nachteile

Limited flexibility of controlling location of the fields on each screen
Reports are a bit cumbersome
Making Global Changes that would impact multiple projects in progress
Linking Artifacts across projects for cross functionality

Walter
  • Branche: Militär
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 14.12.2016

SpiraTeam Review

I am an engineering contractor performing both SW development and SW qa work. I have convinced my last 3 employers to use Spirateam to help with project management and automation testing.

Vorteile

1) great value for the money
2) flexibility
3) can help track all aspects of a project

Nachteile

I am still on version 4, so it may be that some of these are handled by v5

1) not tied in well enough with build systems
2) no test scheduling support supplied for linux systems
3) no simple way to tell which automated hosts are currently being used for automated testing. Should be some GUI screen that provides a single look at whats being scheduled and to what host.

Jennifer
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
4

3
Bewertet am 13.12.2013

SPIRA Review

We have been using Spira for a number of years now overall find it very good for our needs.

Pros:
- Easy to track Test Cases and Releases
- Easy to track Test Cases against Requirements
- Reporting is straightforward and easy to follow
- The Support team is always very quick in responding to our queries
- The ability to copy test cases from project to project is a huge benefit to us
- Export and Import add on for Word is a great tool that has been used by a number of our teams

Cons:
- We have had some issues where test cases have been deleted by accident and the roll back functionality did not quite work to revert them - now if this happens I generally revert directly through the database which is not ideal
- Although there is a History tab this does not quite suit us for versioning our test cases - it would be great if there was proper versioning of test cases so you don't have to duplicate them
- sometimes the front end gets a bit confused and we start seeing duplicate folders and test cases which can cause confusion and filter sometimes doesn't work correctly

Overall the product is easy to use once you understand how everything links together.
As with all tools there are some things we would change to make it more useful for ourselves.
But the system has been a huge benefit to us from managing our test cases through the QA lifecycle.

waleed
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 14.2.2010

Good web based tool

VERY good for its price !

Vorteile

Very good clean work .
Having planing + test cases tracking + issue tracking in one integrated solution is great. It worth every penny of its price.

Nachteile

Requirements ,and Releases features are fair.
Test Cases and Runs features are very good.
Incidents features are good.
Tasks features are only basic.
Some suggestions:-
1-Need to enable multiple resources assignment for tasks.
2-It will be great to submit time in a weekly time sheet view. with resource tasks as rows and days as columns.
3- It will be nice to enable the user to choose a distinct color for each status in the incidents workflow definition. so he/she can easily recognize it in the grid.
4- In the Requirement screens, it will be nice to make the colored inductors for testing and tasks "click-able" linking to the corresponding test cases or tasks

Pascal
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 30.3.2010

Good mid range ALM-software for a good price

good software covering a lot of functions for a good price

Vorteile

Very quick und friendly support with honest and competent answers.
Interesting price.
Important ALM-function are covered

Nachteile

However we miss some specific functions. Therefore we need workarounds or specific implementations:

Cross-project associations or copy function for custom properties

Render different attachments format (without coping them as image in the description field) in a HTML report

Ability to change or add custom report

Copying configuration between different installations

Data migration from (other than the 4 supported tools) third party software with attachments

Disabling not always used mandatory fields (planed effort) in the different asp pages

Riccardo
  • Branche: Öl & Energie
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Monatlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 18.3.2020

Spira review

Vorteile

the feauture i like mosto are remote launch, easy to duplicate project structure

Nachteile

it's difficult tu upgrade the version. It will be appreciate a automate tool for version update

Antwort von Inflectra

Hi Riccardo,
Thanks for the review. Sorry to hear about the difficulties you have run into upgrading your version. We released a completely new upgrading system in v6.0 last year, I'm not sure if you have tried that version?
We have made continual improvements to the ease of use of the application itself and the upgrading tools in v6.0 and later.

Beantwortet am 20.3.2020
Russell
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
1
Kundenbetreuung
1

1
Bewertet am 8.1.2014

WASTE OF TIME AND WORSE, "MONEY"

I can expect better from a open source project, and that would be free. This is quite literally the most dysfunctional piece of software that I have ever had to deal with.
API is buggy, bulky, and non-intuitive.
Copy then paste is broken
Custom properties are very limited
no reporting tools to search test runs based off of custom properties Vs permutations of properties..
etc.....
etc.

Your better off implementing your own MySQL database with it's own web front end.

Antwort von Inflectra

We're sorry that Russell doesn't like SpiraTeam, however we're surprised by his comments because his company has been using it for the past 4 years and renewed it as recently as 3 days ago (January 4th, 2014).

We recommend customers take a trial version and try it out for themselves...

Beantwortet am 8.1.2014
Bill
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 5.6.2009

I would reccomend this product to anyone who needs to manage a project with test cases.

I would reccomend this product to anyone who needs to manage a project with test cases and requirements.

Vorteile

The product does an outstanding job on collecting the information needed to manage projects both large and small. The application has a good road map for future enhancements and helps me manage my projects without the normal amount of effort.

Nachteile

The screens could use some user inferface enhancements to make it easier to navigate. The filters, although useful, can confuse you as to what you are seeing. Many time I think I'm missing data to only find that the system ha me in a filter.

Amanda
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 18.1.2015

Excellent product

Overall SpiraTeam is an excellent product, very easy to use and testers love the set up. I have been setting it up onsite for a major client and showing their test team how to use the product. As well as the set up, I am also hooking it up to Rapise to get automated testing in place for a continuous deployment solution.

There have been one or two issues, however, the Inflectra support team are very, very quick to help and resolve any problems, and they also readily implement change suggestions if you come up with something that would be useful.

Note: Make sure you take a full back up before updating to newer versions if running on a local server.

Rahul
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 16.7.2009

Excellent Value for Money, replacement for QC

It can still improve with additional features such as mutiple copy paste, more stable build for IE 8 users. But an excellent buy for this price. Reliable and well priced tool.

Vorteile

We have used this tool for organisation of 50 users and it has worked perfectly. It has got all the features which a Test and Defect management tools should have.

Nachteile

Its not very stable on new IE 8. Need to have some more basic feature to improve usability and speed of writing, designing Test Scripts.

Antwort von Inflectra

The mentioned issue with IE8 was addressed many versions ago (v2.2+).

Beantwortet am 3.3.2010
Sundaranatarajan
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 23.3.2012

Wondeful Product

Certainly very well suited product for the entire life cycle.

Vorteile

1. Feature rich product
2. Excellent support even during the weekends
3. Very good integration facilities offerd

Nachteile

1. Workflow support for requirements, test cases, test step etc similar to incident will be useful. This will allow differentiaing the requester and reviewer.
2. EA Integration does not have support for TAG values
3. Good if the product can support copying custom properties and list across projects.

Boris
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

3
Bewertet am 11.3.2015

SpiraTeam

Pros:
Great integration story with variety of third party tools.
Strong customization capabilities
Availability of all key components

Cons:
Reports don't have enough graphical representations.
Limited and not very intuitive customization of the reports.
Some painful flows in the integration with very popular tool on the market: Jira.

Antwort von Inflectra

Thanks for the feedback, we are aware of the JIRA integration piece and we are going to be releasing a direct cloud connect option in the very near future for customers where both tools are cloud-based.

Beantwortet am 11.3.2015
Obaidur
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 28.12.2011

Can't beat the awesome customer support

i would highly recommend this product as QA/ requirement management tool.

Vorteile

Inflectra customer support team provides the best customer support in the software industry. It is simply uncompareable. Can't thank Mike and Adam enoguh for their support. The team is very rich in knowledge and can answer or solve any problem that i come accross.

Nachteile

Sometime upgrade and patch installation is bit confusing.

Marcus
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 2.3.2011

SpiraTeam Review

So far, we would highly recommend the product and the company. It is a great light-weight alternative to HP Quality Center, which we also evaluated.

Vorteile

Product is lightweight, flexible, feature-rich, responsive. Company has good documentation and provides excellent customer support. Reasonable pricing.

Nachteile

Only a few very minor issues so far, but nothing worth reporting.

Sharon
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

3
Bewertet am 25.6.2010

Excellent support

Have just started using and it seems good thus far. Will have to use it some more before I can actually recommend it.

Vorteile

Just started using the tool and pretty easy. Had wueations and got immediate response form support staff- A nice person called Mike.

Nachteile

Too bad it does not have copy features for workflows etc from 1 project to another.

Owen
Owen Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Essen & Trinken
  • Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 14.4.2021

A system with virtues and aspects to improve

The most necessary changes that Inflectra SpiraTeam can develop in new improvements are the following: the grids can be very restrictive and do not offer the possibilities of quickly ordering the launches, in the requirements module it is where they must make more changes to increase the speed and for last I would like to see in a new version a better way to create custom reports.

Vorteile

Inflectra SpiraTeam is a product that works satisfactorily with multiple browsers such as Chome, Opera and Firefox without presenting compatibility problems, it is very easy to manage and maintain and another positive aspect is the robust integration with AxoSoft OnTime. My recommendation is to work day by day with Inflectra SpiraTeam and request technical assistance if necessary. Also, I recommend asking Inflectra to add more features in a new release. SpiraTeam has a lot to improve, but it is on the right track.

Nachteile

There are many improvements that the Inflectra SpiraTeam team can implement in a new update, for example, the grids, custom reports and the requirements module. SpiraTeam should implement and add more custom reporting options, improve testing functionality, and increase the speed of the requirement module.

Peter
  • Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Weitere für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 16.9.2020

SpiraTeam - The HP ALM/HPQC Killer

My philosophy is that the tool should fit the project, not the other way round, so I use SpiraTeam as and when the project requires. All my tests begin life as Excel checklists. If we have specific requirements then I will make use of the Requirements and map them to Test Scripts to get full traceability from a requirements, through testing, through defect management to reporting of test coverage. We write and maintain our own legacy systems, so most of our projects only have high level requirements, hence there is little point using the full suite of SpiraTeam, as it is overkill for such small projects.

For most projects, SpiraTeam is used as more of a project place holder at a very high level to track project details and capture any requirements documentation. It is inefficient to write test scripts in Excel for small projects and import them in to SpiraTeam and execute them from SpiraTeam, as this is a needless duplication of effort.

I've implemented Exploratory Testing, so test scripts are high level one-liners, reading more like a checklist than a typical Step 1, Step 2, Step 3 style of test scripts. Familiarity with our own in-house software renders the need to write detailed step by step tests redundant. When new legislation is passed that we must comply with, I use SpiraTeam for Test Management to dot the I's and cross the T's, making use of requirements capture, test scripting, requirements mappings, test execution, defect management and Reporting.

Vorteile

Easier and more user-friendly to use than HP ALM/QC, whilst offering a similar level of comprehensive features, for a lot less outlay than HP's ALM/QC, IBM, CompuWare etc.

SpiraTeam is flexible enough to be used differently for each project. For example, SpiraTeam can be used as a document repository for one project, just a test script and test execution tool for another, and as a full blown project life cycle tool encompassing requirements, tests, defects, management and reporting functions.

The support provided by Inflectra is head and shoulders above the competition, showing the big boys how it should be done. Responses are prompt and with plenty of examples relevant to your industry sector to help get you going. Don't be surprised if [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] himself replies to your support request. It seems that the company's sales team are well versed in using the software tools that they sell. For us, it is the support that wins out over any rivals.

Pricing is clear and upfront, unlike some of the smoke and mirrors sales tactics used by other vendors who shall remain nameless but here are some hints ... Has Problems, It Breaks More and Don't Expect to Last Long.

Nachteile

Upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 fails. In the past upgrading other vendor tools has been a deal breaker when it failed. A tool should be able to upgrade itself without throwing any SQL errors or similar. Administrators and DBA's should not need to run any specific scripts or commands, the tool should do this automatically and without error. We are unable to take advantage of new features offered in 6.0 and beyond.
Integration of any test tool with a business is not easy because the tool forces you to work its way rather than the tool supporting existing processes.
I needed to write a VB script to translate/transpose my test scripts into the correct format for importing into SpiraTeam, as a consequence of the tool forcing the tester to work how the tool works.

Tom
  • Branche: Telekommunikation
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 14.12.2016

Pretty Good!

Overall, I like SpiraTeam. There's a bunch of different ALM solutions out there. I prefer something easy of a lot of confusing functionality. SpiraTeam is somewhere in the middle. It has a good balance. I use it for keeping track of test cases, but don't use the requirements functionality. I wish we did use the Requirement functionality, but the developers I work with have a thing about NOT documenting what they are developing... In any case, I can produce the results of the test effort rather easily so the rest of the team can see where we are within the project.
Some of the annoyances are the ability to produce a report and distribute to the rest of the team. With the templates that SpiraTeam provides, I would like something a lit bit different. The templates just don't provide the information that I need. I know there is a way to modify the templates, but never had time to devote to figure it out. Also, the way arranging tests in folders and then moving tests around in the folders has been difficult over the versions of SpiraTeam. I like how tests are arranged in that way. It helps keep everything organized in a good manner, but the implementation of it is not entirely perfect. test cases often get put in the wrong place and have to spend some time moving them around. My last annoyance is how test cases are copied and pasted. When pasting a test case, it places it on the top of the test case I copied, not underneath it. That bugs me more than anything.
But when judging SpiraTeam as a whole, I do like the product, but it's those little interface annoyances that get in the way.

Vorteile

I like the concept of how test cases are arranged, within folders.

Nachteile

I don't like how the concept of the folders was implemented. Often times, when copying and pasting test cases, it gets placed in the wrong location. Have to spend extra time getting test cases and folders placed in the right location.

Antwort von Inflectra

Hi Tom
Thanks so much for the very fair and detailed review, we appreciate the time you spent writing it.
I would like to mention that in SpiraTeam v5.0 we completely overhauled the test case and test set folders in line with the issues you identified, so please try out the newest version and let us know if you have any suggestions or feedback.

Beantwortet am 14.12.2016
Mark
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
3

4
Bewertet am 15.2.2019

Are you in Wagile Hell?

With Spira Team we are building out our B2B and B2C solutions. We use the Planning Boards for SPrint Planning and daily stand up reference. WE use the Incidents page for tracking defects and Test Cases for Test Management. We also use Requirements for High Level Requirements, decomposing into Use Cases. We can bring in third parties as required to communicate their cards.

Vorteile

Where you are in the B2B market and have tech clients who remain Waterfall in their planning, yet you are more enlightened, this is a suitable tool. It does allow you to plan your dev trains according to iterations and project onto a scrum board. At the same time it allows you to map these cards to a set of requirements.

In addition, you can plan your test cases and track defects all in the one platform. Sure, you could go down the Atlassian route, Inflectra appears to be better value for money, especially when adding modules.

Nachteile

Insufficient integrations available with market defacto standard testing tools.

The training model is on a consulting model - not great for start ups and scale ups. Need more training videos dealing with the set up in situations of increasing complexity!

Was advised that Inflectra is responsive to customer feedback feature requests. Have not experienced this yet, despite regular feedback.

Because most teams spend so much time in the Planning Board, more investment is required to improve usability of this page. Its good, just not great yet.

It would be great to restrict visibility of external users to specific pages or to specific cards, instead we have to create separate projects for these groups, which is not always ideal when inserting external groups into internal team work.

Tammy
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
4

4
Bewertet am 2.12.2016

Requirements and Test Management in one place

The primary goal of the software we were looking for was the management of requirements and testing along with a built-in traceability matrix and reports. SpiraTeam included these at a reasonable cost. We purchased the 4.2 version and have not upgraded to the latest.

We like the feature that not only maps the requirement to test case(s) but also indicates how many of the associated test cases have passed/failed. The filtering on tables for Requirements, Test Cases and Incidents is very helpful. Also like the folder and subfolder concepts to easily group system features. We have not used the Test Sets feature.

We've been able to generate requirements and test reports and make some modifications. I am not a developer so this was a bit challenging and was not able to figure out how to create a report for bugs not linked to test cases. SpiraTeam does have a report showing Test Cases with associated incidents of which I was able to expand to get additional incident information other than just the ID. They have a handful of other reports as well.

We used several administrative features. Adding new users and projects is fairly easy and straight forward. We configured the Incident work steps (workflow) to meet our business workflow (e.g., added Works as Designed and Close (by Design)), added some custom fields and adjusted field properties (e.g., hide, require) per the workstep. We used the email notifications feature as well. We also synchronized with Jira but abandoned this. We could not get the components to map but mostly because after trying it, we found it much easier to manage defects in one system for our internal processes. Once a bug is synchronized and written to Jira, you can only update it from Jira, not SpiraTeam.

It would be nice to have a feature that lets you know when a test case should be retested because the associated bugs are fixed.

Customer Service is responsive and professional. Sometimes I found answers to my questions on their Knowledge Base.

Overall good experience. Really helps to see that requirements are covered by test cases and gives the ability to manage test case (pass/fail) in one place without having to use spreadsheets!

Sudha
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 17.10.2014

Spira Feedback

Spira is a very good QA tool. It is very easy to use and very nice documents to follow. Very affordable price. Very good customer service. I am very happy using this tool and pleased with the customer service quick responses. However, here are some of the improvements and enhancement suggestions.

1. Is this compatible to use in all the browsers. Currently, if I am using chrome, when I try to edit the test case there is no way of saving. Save button is disabled. Update button is not displaying on the edited step.

Today I started using IE to see if it will work better. Any ideas on that which browser it works well or is it properly tested to use in all browsers?

2. If working on a test script or projects using Spira, user accidently deletes the test case, is there a way that we can restore the data? Any history to bring back the deleted test case? If this is not there now, I request to add as a future enhancement to benefit.

3. Why do we need in Test cases also Execute button and in Test Sets also Execute button? It is very confusing. Usually it should be in Test Sets.

4. Axosoft and Spira test documents can be clearer to understand from a QA tester perspective.

5. I am still learning and trying to experiment the full features.

Thanks.

Antwort von Inflectra

Hi Sudha

Thanks for the positive feedback. I think you have some questions as well as the review. For questions 1-5 I would submit a help desk ticket to us (if you have not already).

In answer to the questions for anyone reading:
1) Spira works with all versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera as well as IE8 or later.
2) If you delete a test case, simply go to Administration > Project History Changes and you can revert the delete.
3) You can execute a test case or a test set because sometimes smaller teams don't want to use the test set functionality and just assign test cases directly. For larger teams, test sets are optimal.
4) Thanks for the feedback, the integration with AxoSoft OnTime is an integration feature and is definitely more technical than the rest of the system.

Beantwortet am 20.10.2014
Kevin
  • Branche: Lebensmittelproduktion
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 2.12.2016

Great product for managing software testing at a great price.

SpiraTeam has been a great tool for meeting our Software Quality Testing goals. We use Planning to track our business requirements and trace them to our test cases. We use the Testing section to capture all our test cases and record our test runs. We have started to use the Rapise Test Automation Tool to integrate with SpiraTeam and run our test automation scripts. We use Tracking to document all our test failures and track incidents for our projects. The Dashboard and Reporting sections have been valuable in communicating test progress and results to our project teams. We have been very pleased with the tools use and performance.

Vorteile

All the functionality needed for our Software Quality Testing goals at a great price.

Nachteile

Reporting could be easier to manage and sorting columns by "not" would be valuable - ex. Status = "not" Accepted for Requirements.

Verifizierter Rezensent Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Weitere für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 24.4.2018

Have used SpiraTeam for several years and find the product features getting very rich.

Being able to demonstrate application lifecycle management in one application regardless of the framework of choice!

Vorteile

Recently, I used some of its custom reporting functionality and was amazed at the easy interface and the out-of-the-box functionality. Very good.

Nachteile

At this point, I can't think of anything as they have a good roadmap, webinars, and user groups that support most of the immediate questions I have had.

Michael
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 5.5.2009

We are using Spirateam / Spiratest for test case management and for managing our testing...

We are using Spirateam / Spiratest for test case management and for managing our testing workforce. Also we are using it to track test case execution.
-> This is where I can recommend the tool to others

Whatever question we had was answered by Inflectra customer service in a timely and competent way. As a software company ourselves I was very much impressed.
-> This is a major reason to go and invest into Inflectra software. The money spent is worth every cent.

We cannot use the integrated ticketing tool and unfortunately were not able to integrate with our Jira ticketing solution the way we planned. The promoted Jira interface was a major reason to select Spiratest and we were very disappointed that it does not really work. However this feature is promised for a later release 2009.
-> We are hoping that Jira integration will be improved and integrated into the admin interface by the Spira development team as promised end of 2008.

Vorteile

- world class customer service
- product is still improved and enhanced
- cost/feature ratio is ok
- helps us to improve software development process
- we are using the Excel importer often also to create new testcases. This is really fast.
- direct access to the MSSQL databaes allows custom report generation

Nachteile

- Jira integration is not really working
- Jira integration is only done with cryptic configuration files and not using the web-admin interface.
- doesn't work well with Firefox browsers
- doesn't work under Linux
- test case creation using the web-gui is kind of time consuming
- reporting could be more configurable directly in Spiratest

Kristin
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
2
Kundenbetreuung
3

3
Bewertet am 14.10.2014

SpiraTeam Review

Overall, the product is a great value. There are definitely things that can be improved though.
* Make reporting easier to use and more flexible. One of our number 1 complaints from Managers that use the system including myself is that we can't easily get data out of the system.
* Make it easier to create custom reports.
* The testing functionality is still cumbersome. We have seen our testing times increase fairly significantly since we started using the product. While some of that was expected, the tool is slow and not very efficient in some cases. For example instead of allowing multiple modules to be added at one time, the testers have to search for each one separately.
* The requirements module is slow.
* Performance of the product overall could be improved.
* Grids are restrictive. I have gotten lots of feedback with people wanting the ability to do things like double sort the grids or multiselecting certain fields like release.
* The customer service is fantastic but the reason I didn't give it an outstanding score is because I wish we had more say with enhancements. I wish we could pay you for an enhancement that was really important to us or for you to create a report for us.

Antwort von Inflectra

We appreciate the feedback. Reporting is one of those areas where we have added significant new capabilities but users always want to slice and dice things in different ways. The custom reporting added in v4.1 has helped by allowing users to create their own reports and we shall be adding more custom graphs in future version.
For enhancements we have 5000+ customers so sadly we do have to make decisions about priority, which is one challenge with a tool that is designed to be used by large numbers of customers that have their own processes...

Beantwortet am 14.10.2014
Dieter
  • Branche: Industrieautomation
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

3
Bewertet am 19.5.2017

You get more than you pay for SPIRATeam - easy to use - get better from update to update

- Great overview over the project progress
- Easy administration effort

Vorteile

- easy administration
- traceability over the whole development process
- good test integration
- integrated dokument versioning
- good and fast support

Nachteile

- external test tool integration arn´t freeware anymore
- text editor for inputs arn´t so good like in other tools

Neethu
  • Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 7.4.2021

Great product for the Quality Team

Vorteile

I have been using this product for almost 10years for my quality team. I really like the product; it is very easy to use, very easy to track team's performance , easy to do requirement traceability ,easy to assign tasks for the team. Overall a great product.

Nachteile

I am satisfied with the features I am using.

Don
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 28.1.2010

High Functionality, Low Price & Responsive Support - It's a Winner!

Highly recommended.
Cannot be beaten for functionality and support at the price point. And I've looked at many, with over 10 years experience with the big boys !!! Throw away those Word documents and Excel spreadsheets. At this price you can afford this top class software. You'll wonder why you made do with anything less!! And there is a free 30 day trial. That's how we got hooked.

Vorteile

Functionality, Price and Support. What more do you need in a Test Management Tool? And it has integration with other tools and test automation.
SpiraTeam was trialled over three major projects and was enthusiastically accepted by both the IT group and the Business Areas doing UAT with absolutely minimal training. SpiraTeam provides a high level of functionality at an extremely affordable price point. I was extremely pleased with the responsiveness of Inflectra to every issue and suggestion I raised.
When you're sitting in a meeting with SpiraTeam users discussing incident reports from one of the trial projects, and the Director turns to you and says..."give me the quote...we need SpiraTeam" you know the product is doing the job for both test process improvement and management reporting. A winner for all !!

Nachteile

Oracle support (but it is on the way).
Greater email support ( such as broadcast notification to all SpiraTeam users)- but that is on the way too.

David Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 26.5.2016

SpiraTeam and Inflectra great alround value

Very intuitive and easy to use application with custom role based access that suites any organisation.
We have run the in-house version for over four years now and nothing much to complain about and when we've had a problem the support has been fantastic.
We don't use the application to its fullest potential but extensively for test management and reporting.

Vorteile

Ease of use, no client installations, supports the main browser flora, a multitude of plugins for integration with other systems. Configuration flexibility. Plenty of features to grow in to. Fantastic support team and a vendor that listens to the user base addapting and improving the application at every new release. Very reasonable licensing and support fees.

Nachteile

I can only think of one drawback that is MS platform dependancy for the server installation and db.

Antwort von Inflectra

Thanks David

Beantwortet am 31.5.2016
Ambrish
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 14.6.2018

Its an awesome prodect from Inflectra for overall project management . Customer support is...

Vorteile

Nice features,integration with most of the automation tools,ease of navigation,easy to understand UI,tracking of tasks,version control,access as per roles,easy tracking of all artifacts and easy to understand the mappings with them.

Nachteile

Reporting can be much better.Sometimes some formats throw error while reporting,mostly detailed incident reports fail while attaching images other than jpeg formats.

Boris
  • Branche: Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
3
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 2.12.2016

SpiraTeam, great potentials, good feature set and excellent support team

I believe the fact that I bringing with me the SpiraTeam to the third company I am working for, speaks for itself. In my current company, I was able to replace Jenkins and TestRail with the SpiraTeam. Eliminating an extra tool is always great news for the companies, thank you SpiraTeam!

Vorteile

Great variety of plugins

Nachteile

Limitations for some integrations, Jenkins will be a good example for that.

Antwort von Inflectra

Thanks Boris, we have the page rendering speed, firmly in our sights for the next version.

Beantwortet am 2.12.2016
Lawrence
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 11.12.2009

Great feature set at any price - yet at the best price!

SpiraTeam from Inflectra was inexpensive enough for us to use when our QA efforts were first launching as well as feature rich enough now that we have dozens of testers, analysts, and developers involved. We plan to bring on a test automation tool next year (QuickTest Pro, SmarteScript, or TestComplete) and SpiraTeam came with the hooks built in. In fact, SpiraTeam has a number of extra features built in that may make it even more useful to us over time; such as Project & Requirements Management. Their sales and support team have been invaluable in helping us understand how to use their software and even how to best test our software as well. They are flexible and very fast to respond (even after we bought) Their pricing model makes sense for the initial purchase and the annual maintenance. Simply put, Im sold. Its too tough to justify a competing product, no matter how popular, at tens of thousands of dollars more.

Vorteile

SpiraTeam is an incredible value. Its feature set rivals competitors that are literally 10 times the cost. It has provided all the test case management that we need & the sales/support team has been immediately responsive to every question we've had.

Nachteile

The only challenge we've had with SpiraTeam is the "team" part. It isn't quite as graceful as we'd like for using a team of testers to execute tests. They came up with a solution so it's not a show stopper but I hope it improves with the next release.

Rosaria
Rosaria Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Branche: Marketing & Werbung
  • Unternehmensgröße: Selbstständig
  • Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
0

4
Bewertet am 10.11.2022

Tiri un SpiraTeam di sollievo

Complessivamente utile e dinamico

Vorteile

Ho iniziato a usare questo software durante un breve corso aziendale. È abbastanza facile scrivere i vari step dei macroscenari, una volta individuati

Nachteile

Il nuovo aggiornamento ha cambiato radicalmente la dashboard e quindi ci vuole un attimo per trovare le informazioni che si cercano

Christine
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
1

2
Bewertet am 21.1.2010

I don't know what you mean

Gather project mgmt design specs to your program and you will have a killer app---with integration between project management, bug tracking, and QA.

Vorteile

Integration with bug tracking and testing.

Nachteile

It was slow. Clunky interface. You seriously need to consult an agile expert, and implement better project management capability. Need person based detail, assign two engineers to one task, dashboard where you can choose multiple reports for multiple projects display, group tasks under user story/spec--heirarchy, input hours worked per day (auto accumulation instead of manual), and hours left to do estimate, needs better reporting for project managers, drag and drop tasks to iterations, drag and drop work order (your priority field is REALLY criticality---priority is work order. Progress bar should update automatically with hours worked over hours estimated.

Antwort von Inflectra

We are aware of some of the additional features such as time tracking and enhanced personnel resource tracking that are already planned for future versions.
The ability to drag and drop tasks to iterations does exist (we worked with Christine to show her that feature) and the % complete is deliberately not associated to # hours expended as that is a misleading metric if a task was under-estimated to begin with.

Beantwortet am 22.1.2010
Martin
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionalität
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 23.2.2021

Facilitates the daily work

SpiraTeam is used to manage the test cases of five different development languages and more than fifteen different base products. The overview of all products is elementary and is very well solved in SpiraTeam.
The selection of connectable test software is very good.

Vorteile

SpiraTeam is clear and intuitive to use.
The cockpits are a good starting point for daily work.

Nachteile

The structure of the requirements is not transferred from DevOps and after grouping the original types are lost.

Antwort von Inflectra

We are looking to add a way to keep the requirement types from ADO once the requirements are nested and grouped in the SpiraTeam hierarchy.

Beantwortet am 26.2.2021
Kevin
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 26.10.2013

Excellent package, it helped improve our internal processes

We migrated from OnTime to SpiraTeam and couldn't be happier. For us, the power of SpiraTeam is the way it ties everything together. It also clear visibility of things like: This release includes these features and addresses these defects, and these test cases were executed. it is clear what is being included in each release, and it improves communication between our project managers and the developers. We have three testers, and they use the testing features of SpiraTeam both in concert with an automated tool (TestComplete) and for manual testing. We recently hired a junior tester to do manual testing, guided by the test scripts created in SpiraTeam by our lead tester.
Our developers have been asking for a Kanban board, which is not currently available. It is coming, accounting to Inflectra's support. Speaking of support, we've been happy with the results the few times we have needed to call. These days it is relatively unusual to call a company and have your call answered by a real live person, a person who has a detailed understanding of the product, and who has a full command of the English language.
We are hosting the application ourselves. Setup was easy, and the performance is excellent. We looked at a lot of products in this space, from open source to very expensive. SpiraTeam was the best choice for us, and we've never regretted the purchase.

David
David
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 6.1.2011

Top Marks

I've looked at several applications in this segment and this comes out tops so far no doubt about it. If you've never had an ALM before or even a test management tool then you just can't lose. I'm expecting an ROI in man hours the first year of ownership not to mention the lift it will give to our working process along with job satisfaction for all our users.

Vorteile

Total value for money, a customer service second to none, this is a vendor with the customer in focus. The application is very intuitive and meets all our current needs with plenty of room for growing.

Nachteile

None so far

John
  • Branche: Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 11.9.2017

Great value and great support

Vorteile

Feature set for the price compared to competing products. Flexible licensing. Very good support from the company.

Nachteile

Very occasionally can be slow, for no apparent reason. Validation against AD can be difficult to setup.

Peter
Peter Mehr Details anzeigen
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionalität
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 2.2.2017

Galina
  • Quelle der Bewertung Mehr Details anzeigen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionalität
0
Bedienkomfort
0
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 29.4.2013

Easy to use ALM tool at an affordable price

We’ve been using SpiraTeam for test management for almost a year and already implemented 2 projects with it. User experience is great, since SpiraTeam is a lightweight tool and we hadn’t had any experience with such a tool before adopting SpiraTeam. The most value it adds to our test management process and to the company in general is that all test cases and test results are stored in a single repository, both manual and automated, and it is very easy to organize and find test cases or retrieve test results using filters. We find particularly useful the options for test case re-use (linked test cases), separating test cases from test data (parameters), using test sets as containers for test cases, and using custom fields. We are eager to also adopt the other modules, especially incident management and requirements management, to benefit from the traceability between all the different artifacts we manage. And yes, it is very important that all of this comes at an affordable price with really exclusive customer support - we purchased the Enterprise Edition and have no problems whatsoever with the number of concurrent users. We expect future releases of SpiraTeam to include customizable workflows for the other artifacts, not only for incidents, as well as enhanced search.

98 Bewertungen

Ähnliche Kategorien